Sorry, but if there's ever been a time to yell "sellout", it's now:
Edit: Okay, maybe "sellout" is a bit harsh, but "absurd" and "ridiculous" still apply.
Sorry, but if there's ever been a time to yell "sellout", it's now:
Edit: Okay, maybe "sellout" is a bit harsh, but "absurd" and "ridiculous" still apply.
[migrated from myspace blog]
Fall Out Boy...you're not emo.
13-year-old girls with RAZR phones...you're not emo.
Anyone who's ever said "I'm so emo"...you're not emo.
Anyone who's never heard of Sunny Day Real Estate, Jawbreaker, Roadside Monument, Christie Front Drive, Texas is the Reason, The Promise Ring, or Mineral...you're not emo.
Stop hijacking words you don't understand.
[migrated from myspace blog]
Ever wonder what happens when trash spontaneously combusts after the trash man picks it up? Now we know. Apparently the procedure involves finding the nearest parking lot and dumping the entire load until the fire department can come clean up the mess.
[migrated from myspace blog]
Who says there's nothing worth reading in the newspaper? I found a couple of read-worth articles today. The first is about archive.org, which is apparently where old webpages go when they die. It's kind of a time machine to the past for the internet. So what did Google look like before anyone had heard of it?
http://web.archive.org/web/19981111183552/google.stanford.edu/
And the second article for today - PKD (and at last, a decent DVD release of Blade Runner.)
[migrated from myspace blog]
I think I've figured out why I write so much on here. It's not that people are actually reading it (I know, hard to believe, but there have been something like 700 hits on my blog since I started). Somewhere along the line, maybe around the end of college or the next few years following, I began to feel a desire to write. I was already through with all my English, Writing, and Literature classes I would ever take, at that point, but I believe the desire came from somewhere else. First of all, starting with one summer during college, I started reading for enjoyment again. From that point I've pretty much been collecting books and wearing out my library card. I'm not saying I've read a tremendous amount of books compared to a lot of people, but my reading list is more than I can keep up with (I'm not even that fast of a reader.) Secondly I've grown, through books, movies, and television, to have a great respect for the art of presenting a story that can be maintained for as much as 800 pages, or 2-3 hours on screen. It's this second factor with which I think I've been obssessed.
I've always had a great respect for art in general (maybe not so much with the opera.) For someone like me who doesn't have any great artistic skill, it's easy to be in awe of someone who can paint a masterpiece, compose a great song, or write an epic novel (or seven) telling one story with dozens of characters, settings, and subplots without having it fall apart at the seams. Also there's just something about that image of a person alone in front of a typewriter (or laptop, now) actually creating something out of nothing. "All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy." Okay, so maybe Kubrick and Nicholson don't make the most compelling argument for being a writer.
At least with music I can comprehend what it takes to develop the skill to be a decent musician, although songwriting is a whole different level. I took a photography class several years ago because I saw that as an art form I could actually take part in. And I did for awhile. But something like painting, or sculpting, I can't even begin to understand. So why do I have some illusion I could write a great story. Maybe even one someone might want to read? I think it has to do with the fact that writing, in and of itself is that that difficult. I could sit here all day long and write pages and pages of meaningless unconnected thoughts that wouldn't be worth the bandwidth they're wasting (and maybe that's all I'm doing now.) It's easy to tell myself that if I only had a really good story idea, or a really well developed character to write about, that I could write it. That's probably the equivalent of saying that because I can strum a few chords I should be able to write Stairway to Heaven.
(Don't expect a better ending. I'm not a writer. But I wonder if I could play one on TV?)
[migrated from myspace blog]
It seems to me lately that people in service industries aren't even trying. They don't really care anything about doing a good job, and would do their job from home if they thought they could get away with it. It's like not effort is being made, and the only reason anyone will help you is to get you to stop bugging them.
Red Lobster: Clueless waiter allowed three of us to sit at a table with garlic cheese biscuits and 1 dirty biscuit plate without ever bringing any extras or clean ones. My side dish was not what I ordered and I think he stopped at the table a total of two times after taking our order. We actually had to send a waitress to look for him so we could get the bill.
Sam's Club: After making a purchase that required going to the customer service, they took approximately no interest in actually getting what was already paid for. Couldn't find the keys to the cage, and after they did, took their sweet time actually getting it.
Circuit City: Okay, first of all, their stores are just arranged poorly. The cash registers are scattered all over the store, and they apparently don't do any training whatsoever for Black Friday the way Best Buy does. But $13 for a 2 gig micro flash drive for my keychain was too good to pass up at 5 AM. The girl running the cash register in the back by the computer products wasn't even in her own department. At least one employee had failed to show up. It took two people to figure out how to open the little plastic boxes that hold smaller products using the magnet. It took her about 35 minutes to get through 6 customers. Meanwhile there are about 300 more people still in line outside in the cold because she doesn't know how to ring up a computer, and the cash register software is running slow. (Then I saw the guy who figured out how to open the security boxes later tonight at the Schuster Center where he was apparently seeing Cats. I wasn't there to see Cats, but that's a whole different story.) It's one thing to find a good deal, but is it really worth is when it costs 2 1/2 hours of sleep and a total of an hour standing in line as well?
[migrated from myspace blog]
Okay, so it's probably not socially acceptable to laugh at drunk people, but no one got hurt, and I can't help it...
So maybe drunk people aren't funny, but you have to admit, seeing midgets that aren't there warrants a laugh.
In the course of some Thanksgiving grocery shopping I happened upon a new(er) flavor of Doritos I had not seen before. [Repeat subject line here.] I picked up a bag on impulse. I like most "buffalo" flavored foods, and I like Cool Ranch Doritos, so what's not to like?. I guess I was expecting a bit of literal taste interpretation of the name. Like Frank's RedHot with some creamy ranch dressing. But it seems they really did just mix together Cool Ranch with one of the spicy Dorito flavors, so there's not really a creamy flavor at all, and the buffalo portion, while spicy, is only arguable as "buffalo".
The original buffalo sauce was nothing more than Frank's RedHot and melted butter mixed together at Anchor Bar in Buffalo, New York. (Pay attention Jessica Simpson. No buffalo meat required.) So until Frito-Lay is prepared to partner up with Frank's to get some real "buffalo" flavor, I'd suggest a more conservative use of the word. That being said, as corn chips go, you could do a whole lot worse (unless you just hate spicy, cool-ranchy flavors, of course, in which case you need help.)
[migrated from myspace blog]
Okay, the title is really misleading. Jason Martin won't be squaring off with Jeremy Enigk, but yesterday both of their new CDs arrived in my mailbox together. Both of these artists are responsible, in my opinion (along with Dave Bazan, Poor Old Lu and others - thanks Seattle), for pushing musical boundaries and allowing me and others to enjoy some originality in music. (I know, nothing is truly original in music.)
For Enigk, it's his first solo release in 10 years, having reunited Sunny Day Real Estate for a time and formed The Fire Theft. World Waits less avant-garde than Return of the Frog Queen and a little closer to The Fire Theft, yet it still employs some acoustic guitar and more guest musicians than I would think to be possible. For me the highlight of Enigk's music has been his voice. His vocals manage to be heartbreakingly painful and unabashedly joyful at the same time.
With My Island, Jason Martin takes Starflyer 59 on its continuing evolution that logically follows Talking Voice vs. Singing Voice. As an album, it's creative and playful, yet a little dark and very gritty. If Jeremy Enigk is about the voice, then Starflyer is about the guitar. It's ALWAYS been about the guitar. Perhaps not a guitar virtuoso, Jason started out on the first albums with about 20 layers of guitar on each song, but has come to be a catchy songwriter with simple but memorable guitar solos, and sometimes more than simple (I Am the Portuguese Blues). TV vs. SV saw Jason's guitar with a whole new set of pedals from Smart People Factory. It sounds like they're still there, but this time around with a little more distortion. Overall the songs are faster and more driving than the laid back sound on TV vs. SV. The song "Good Sons" might fit on My Island, giving a glimpse of where the current sound came from. My Island's bass lines also have a lot of movement compared to any previous SF release. It can't be easy to put out songs of this quality, but Jason has managed to continue the streak.
[migrated from myspace blog]
Somehow I've become a bit of a TV junkie this fall. I had about 5 shows on my "must watch" list last year. Then I had to go and add two more incredible shows to that list. The only new show I've really bothered to watch had me hooked before it ever aired. I downloaded a copy of the Heroes premiere over the summer and knew I'd have to watch it when it showed up on NBC in the fall. Now, four episodes into its first season, it keeps getting better with every episode. I was never really into sci fi, even though I did watch Star Trek TNG back in high school. Ever since Lost, though, sci fi has been making a mainstream comeback. Battlestar Galactica is moving to NBC in the spring and Heroes has the largest audience of any new show on TV. I'm not able to quantify the reasons for a mainstream sci fi popularity, but I know for me it's been the shift in the approach to storytelling. Writers bring such a fresh approach to the genre by focusing on the drama and making us care about the characters first, and secondly creating an incredible story shrouded in mystery.
Twice I've come away from Heroes with goose bumps. The first time was seeing NYC in the middle of a nuclear explosion just before Hiro jumped back to Japan and 5 weeks earlier. It took the story to a new level. We knew the stakes were huge and the time was short for a Japanese office worker to try to save a huge portion of the American population. The second was seeing a ninja Hiro (if Heroes is the best new show, he's the best new character on TV) from the future speaking perfect English and bringing a message to help the Heroes on their mission.
Lost has had a goosebump moment in each episode so far. Seeing Flight 815 crash from the Other's POV, Ben revealing several big secrets to Jack, and Desmond's new ability to quote speeches from the future as if they were past.
I can't imagine there's ever been a better period to be a TV junkie than this time of incredible writing, ensemble casts, and storytelling that knows no limits.
[migrated from myspace blog]
I never imagined at any point in my life that I would be a teacher. A year and a half ago when I set out on the road to become a flight instructor, I hoped I would be able to find a different exit ramp to flying and time-building before I got to that point. Even though I've only flown with two of them so far, I have five students that I have to take from zero hours to FAA certified private pilots. Now, as I'm sure most would assume to be the case, I know quite about more about flying airplanes than any of my students do. If I didn't then they wouldn't need me to be there. I've passed 5 ground schools, 5 FAA written exams, 8 FAA checkrides consisting of ground and flight portions (my initial instructor ground session being 8 hours long). So clearly the FAA has found me proficient to instruct others in flying.
That being said, after just under 25 total hours of flight instruction given, there are times when I feel a bit like a fraud because I don't have all the answers on the tip of my tongue. I certainly have my strengths when it comes to ground material: systems, aerodynamics. Those come easier to me because they can be understood. Other classes of ground knowledge are just rote memorization: FAA regs, etc. The rote stuff is "use it or lose it." There are things that I'm certain I knew when I took my private pilot checkride that I'm not sure I could answer or rattle off if asked to right now, most likely because of disuse of that information. Granted, 18 months ago I had zero flight hours logged, but I sometimes wonder if people in other professions have the same feelings on occasion. I guarantee my job is easier than being a doctor, but I wonder if a doctor ever feels like there's something they should know better than they do. I sincerely hope more confidence will come in time, but I want to be good at what I do, and be better than / know more than just enough to get by. AOPA's Flight Training magazine has a motto of: A Good Pilot is Always Learning. Maybe that's all it really takes.
A hollow book can be a nifty way to hide something, whether it's a spare key, a secret note, or even money. Most people wouldn't think to browse your library for private or personal things. It's also a great way to pass something to someone discretely--an unsuspecting onlooker will just think you're sharing a very good read!
[migrated from myspace blog]
Part 2 of the series "Things I Found On Wikihow.com That Amuse Me"
Steps
[migrated from myspace blog]
I just read about this. This is seriously amazing!
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,71627-0.html?tw=wn_index_14
By Seán Captain|
02:00 AM Aug, 22, 2006
I entered a conference room in Manhattan and a woman on the TV tossed a handful of rose petals out of the screen, where they floated in the air before my eyes.
At least, that's what I saw. In truth, the image resided on a perfectly flat, 42-inch LCD screen. But the 3-D illusion was fully believable, and I didn't have to wear a dorky set of polarizing glasses.
A new line of 3-D televisions by Philips uses the familiar trick of sending slightly different images to the left and right eyes -- mimicking our stereoscopic view of the real world. But where old-fashioned 3-D movies rely on the special glasses to block images meant for the other eye, Philips' WOWvx technology places tiny lenses over each of the millions of red, green and blue sub pixels that make up an LCD or plasma screen. The lenses cause each sub pixel to project light at one of nine angles fanning out in front of the display.
A processor in the TV generates nine slightly different views corresponding to the different angles. From almost any location, a viewer catches a different image in each eye.
Providing so many views is key to the dramatic results. Sharp Electronics makes an LCD display that projects just two views, requiring an audience to sit perfectly still in front of the screen. With the Philips technology, viewers can move around without losing much of the effect -- one set of left/right views slips into another, with just a slight double-vision effect in the transitions.
The TV can also display standard two-dimensional images, close to HD quality.
The uncanny 3-D illusion stops people in their tracks, as it's meant to. Philips is initially selling the 42-inch screens -- which debuted at the Society for Information Displays conference in June -- to retailers who will create 3-D ads to grab the attention of passing shoppers.
Casinos are interesting in the screens -- the mesmerizing effects may help patrons part with more of their money. Holland Casino just announced plans to install the screens throughout its locations in the Netherlands.
Finding content for home users is more of a challenge.
One nearly ready-made source of content is modern video games, which actually generate three-dimensional objects internally, then flatten the images into 2-D representations for standard monitors. Philips has developed hardware and software that can extract the original depth information from the game engine and use it to create 3-D images on a WOWvx display.
In New York, the company demonstrated the technique with the first-person shooter Call of Duty. It looked almost perfect, except for a little shimmering around the edges of objects, which Philips says will be fixed in the coming months.
The company also has plans for video. The ultimate hope is that studios will produce more 3-D content, like the recent 3-D version of Sony Pictures' Monster House that screened in 162 U.S. theaters. But Philips is developing software to convert standard video to 3-D by analyzing movement to determine the original depth position of people and objects.
A standard laptop running Philips' software was able to convert the DVD The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King into 3-D in real time and display it on Philips's new 20-inch "3D 4YOU" LCD monitor -- a retail-kiosk implementation of the 3-D screen.
The result looked vaguely 3-D, though it was marred by some blurriness and double images.
"I think for consumers this is simply not good enough," said Philips executive Rob de Vogel. "But the progress in the past year is amazing." He expects the company to show a better version of the conversion software to the public in the coming months -- possibly at the next Consumer Electronics Show in January 2007.
[migrated from myspace blog]
Disclaimer: What follows is not an original work of my own. I was browsing through wikihow.com and found what I consider to be one of the most absurd things I've ever read and felt compelled to repost it instead of just posting a link. As far as I know there's not a copyright to it, but I believe whoever wrote it to be completely serious, which is what makes it so funny. Enjoy the flavor...
The actual flavour compounds found in dark chocolate exceed that of red wine, and detecting all these notes can be an extremely fun and educational endeavor. The following will serve as a guideline so that you can extract the fullest flavor potential from dark chocolate.
[migrated from myspace blog]
So I'm not sure what the most popular setting is these days for computer monitors. The only reason I bring it up is that I cropped and sized my background image for my page so that it fills the screen when set at 1024 x 768. I have no idea how to make it look the same for every setting, but the background image was repeated in larger screen settings and it looked kind of stupid, so I took it off repeat. Anyway, I doubt anyone but me cares because my page doesn't really look all that cool anyway, but I think it looks a lot better when it fills the monitor completely.
BTW, anyone who doesn't buy Leigh Nash's new CD (out today) is depriving themselves of some quality songwriting by an amazing singer. Such an incredible fall for music. New releases from Starflyer 59, Jeremy Enigk, Leigh Nash, mewithoutYou, and Fair (already out). Fingers crossed for a solid date on Richard Swift.
"Stay away from whores." - Dwayne 'Dog-The Bounty Hunter' Chapman
[migrated from myspace blog]
I just got back from seeing Monster House in digital 3-D. No more red and blue glasses, here. Two polarized lenses allow each eye to see only one of a doubled image on screen without changing the colors. The effect is mind-blowing. It's not about a lot of objects coming out into the audience as a gimmick, like the Hitchcock 3-D movie at Universal Studios. Instead what you get is a deeper, richer, more realistic film world. The difference is similar to watching Toy Story after only having seen Snow White or Bambi. The screen, instead of a flat surface, becomes a deep stage full of actors and sets, but not limited to one position or point of view. This is the way to watch a movie as far as I'm concerned. And since it's a digital process, things don't have to be shot with double cameras the way they used to do in the 50's. They're taking previous 2-D movies like Nightmare Before Christmas and converting them to 3-D for theatrical re-release. And my understanding is that this isn't limited to animation, but fully usable with live action films as well. So expect to see lots of re-releases of popular movies, but now in 3-D. Probably Star Wars...hopefully The Lord of the Rings trilogy. (Or maybe I'm completely wrong, but I thought I read that somewhere.)
The only downside...$2 extra on the ticket price. You do get to keep the glasses, but no word on whether that'll save you $2 when the next Real D movie comes out or not.
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,14931-2305620,00.html
[migrated from myspace blog]
If you think you can handle the emotions inherent in the viewing, you owe it to yourself to see this movie. Visually, the movie is flawless, seamless. There's not a single shot that looked like an effect or computer generated. Of course, the real accomplishment is telling the stories of heroes and their families. Only 20 people were found alive in the rubble when we were expecting hundreds. This film stays with two police officers who were buried together. Both as a film, and as a reminder, the movie excels.
"We will never forget"
[migrated from myspace blog]
I'm so completely digusted right now. Two young sisters were visiting the house this morning when the 4-year-old decided to take a handful of saliva (do you even realize the amount of effort it takes to create a handful?!) and wipe it from my bare knee down to my ankle. I think that's about enough to put me off having kids.
[migrated from myspace blog]
I'm sorry, I misspelled that. I meant Hulk. And here I was hoping for Batman. I guess I'll have to work on my martial arts skills.
You are Hulk
Hulk
70% Spider-Man
65% Superman
60% Green Lantern
60% Batman
55% Robin
52% Supergirl
40% The Flash
40% Catwoman
30% Iron Man
30% Wonder Woman
15% You are a wanderer with
amazing strength. http://www.seabreezecomputers.com/superhero
[migrated from myspace blog]
First of all I want to say I'm amazed anyone is actually coming here to read these. Apparently there were 16 people on my blog page in one day.
I live in a house with a lot of phones. There is one connected to the wall, two cordless, and two cell phones. Apparently I'm the only person in the house who realizes that when a phone rings, it doesn't mean you have to answer it.
I won't name names, but lets just say that someone here today was complaining after a second phone call in a very short period of time because he was trying to get something else done at the time. I just thought to myself, "Then why are you answering it?"
And then, also today, the phone rang during dinner and a second unnamed person decided to answer it while putting off eating. Do you really think you're that important that the outside world can't do without you for 20 minutes?
All this got me thinking about the fact that most people don't stop to even think if they should or want to answer the phone. Many people screen their calls, but there isn't even caller ID in this household. Most people under 50 or so were raised in a house with a phone, and anyone else with a phone could get ahold of you at any time, if you were home. So intentionally or not, we've all been indoctrinated that when the phone rings, you automatically pick it up and answer it. Maybe people just hate the sound of the phone and want to stop it from ringing. But I encourage everyone (all 16) to stop and think, do you really want to answer that phone right now, or would you rather be doing something else? I support not answering the phone once in awhile, just to see what happens.